NeedingSomeFeedback wrote:

Hi, guys —

I need some advice on views I have about Holy Communion. I don't believe that every time I go to receive Holy Communion I die with Christ. I believe that Christ died once for all of us and we receive Him in the Eucharist in memory of Him so when I receive, I thank Jesus for what He did for us, and receive His Body in memory of Him.

I would also like to receive from the cup of His Blood as he instructed us to. (I know we are told that we receive both His Body and Blood when we receive His Body, but it's not the way Jesus did it at the Last Supper). Also, Eucharistic ministers at the altar and the priests receive both.

It's hard to accept that we can't do the same.


  { Can you provide feedback on my views about Communion and how we should receive Communion? }

Eric replied:

Dear NeedingSomeFeedback,

I'm not sure who told you that you die to Christ when you receive Communion, but that's not really true. (That would be Baptism.)

When we receive the Eucharist, the saving power of Christ's death and Resurrection is applied to us and to our sins as we memorialize his death. St. John the Baptist called Jesus the Lamb of God.

  • Why did He do so?

Because in the Old Testament, the Jews were commanded to celebrate the Passover sacrifice, where a lamb was ritually slain and each family ate of it in the family seder and the blood of the lamb was placed on their doorposts. Those who did this were saved from the angel of death (Well, the firstborns were). Jesus is the Passover Lamb. 1 Corinthians 5:7-8 says,

7 Therefore purge out the old leaven, that you may be a new lump, since you truly are unleavened. For indeed Christ, our Passover, was sacrificed for us. 8 Therefore let us keep the Festival, not with the old bread leavened with malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.

1 Corinthians 5:7-8

This is talking about the Eucharist. It was insufficient for the Jews to just sacrifice the lamb; they had to eat its flesh. Jesus was sacrificed on the Cross, but now we need to eat his flesh to apply that sacrifice to us; that's what the Eucharist is all about. This is why the Psalmist calls the Eucharist the cup of salvation (Psalm 116:13). So I think you are on track in what you believe.

The Eucharist is indeed a memorial but it's more than that; the term Jesus uses for memory is anamnesis, which has sacrificial overtones to it. It's a memorial sacrifice; a making present of the one sacrifice of Christ.

The Synod in Constantinople (January 1156 - May 1157) said,

"Today's sacrifice is like that offered once by the Once-begotten Incarnate Word; it is offered by Him (now as then), since it is one and the same sacrifice."

As for receiving the Body versus the Body and Blood, St. Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians 11:27,

27 So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord.

1 Corinthians 11:27

So if we eat the bread or drink the cup, in either case, we are sinning against the Body and the Blood of the Lord, so St. Paul was equating either form of Communion with receiving both the Body and the Blood. Therefore there is no obligation to receive both forms.

Receiving both forms is a fuller sign, but biblically it is not required. (As for Jesus, remember that the Apostles were bishops and priests, who always receive under both forms, then and now.)


Please report any and all typos or grammatical errors.
Suggestions for this web page and the web site can be sent to Mike Humphrey
© 2012 Panoramic Sites
The Early Church Fathers Church Fathers on the Primacy of Peter. The Early Church Fathers on the Catholic Church and the term Catholic. The Early Church Fathers on the importance of the Roman Catholic Church centered in Rome.

Popular Pages